THIS IS FOR ONE OF OUR BRITISH READERS WHO ASKED FOR MORE DETAILS

The "phone snatching" incident is one of the many things that LEF leadership has been trying to do to suppress any evidence that can be used against them. This boy's family whose phone is snatched away has been caught up in a big storm of scandals including but not limited to some sexual abuse scandals. To suppress evidence of a sex scandal that came out in public about the prominent board member of LEF, IC, the mom and son team have resorted to all kinds of criminal activities. This board member who was  appointed by the late President as a "de facto head of LEF" was the whole and sole of all financial and administrative operations of LEF for the last 15 years and he has done just not unethical things but also many criminal things to "take care" of LEF. The first family was an accomplice to many of the crimes done by this board member. Many in LEF are not in a position to accept this truth and want to believe that late President of LEF and his family were deceived by this man. But common sense should tell us that as a discerning head of a "spiritual" organization the late president should have had the discernment to see that IC was ruining LEF and the credibility of LEF work done by many selfless workers. Wouldn't somebody with some reasonable intelligence say that fifteen years is too long a period for somebody to be blind? Wouldn't it also be logical for anybody with brains to conclude that IC and the late President’s family worked hand in glove as IC had unopposed power over LEF for 15 years? IC the most “powerful” man not only muddled up LEF money but also was caught in one of the worst sex scandals of LEF. When his dishonorable sex scandal came out,a lot of confusion was created in HQ. First family, especially the late president’s wife did all she could to cover up the crimes. IC was known to be "pet" of the late president's wife. People who are witnesses to this sex scandal have been systematically driven out of LEF by every possible manipulation tactic. This boy's family member is suspected to be the key witness to the sex scandal and LEF leadership has done all that is in its power to silence witnesses against this de facto head. This boy was in LEF Bible College for last 5 years and his parents were LEF evangelists for last 30 years. We will be soon publishing the first hand report of what this family has gone through in the last 30 years of its association with LEF, which will help our leaders understand how LEF leadership exploits people’s calling to serve God for carry out its own selfish and greedy agendas. The long story short, this boy who himself is driven out of bible college after his 5 years of wasted stay in LEF Bible college was running from pillar to post to get justice for his parents who have been driven out of the LEF center after being falsely accused of stealing money. In reality, all of these were done to suppress evidence against IC. The mom and son team not only did not listen to this boy’s woes but also tried to shut this family in the closet. This boy to strengthen his case that his family has been unfairly targeted for no fault of theirs has started recording the conversations he has been having with the LEF leadership. These recorded conversations throw a lot of light into how unscrupulous the LEF leadership has been to weaker people in LEF.

During the recently concluded youth retreat, mom and son cornered this boy and his mom and forcefully snatched away the phone and a recorder that this boy had on him. The criminals in LEF illegally unlocked the phone and tried to come with some concocted stories about this boy. This boy went to the local police to place a complaint only to realize that LEF people have already bribed the police and told him not register any complaint. The phone is still in position of LEF people.

Here are our questions?

   1. Why should people who are seen as “leaders of church” ever feel insecure that somebody may be recording them? Shouldn't their “yes” be “yes” and “no” be “
   2. If a person suspects somebody is recording a conversation, are there not some legal ways to ensure that this “offense” is properly taken care of?
   3. Does a leader of LEF wield that kind of power to take the law of the land in to his hands?
   4. W ould the LEF head do the same thing in his country of citizenship, USA? Also, what would he do if somebody pulled his phone away from him or from one of his children?
   5. Now that he took the phone, who gave him the authority to illegally unlock the phone not only to comb through the phone but also use the personal information from the phone to harass some innocent people?
   6. What would you call a man who grabs away another person’s personal belongings with him? A thief or a robber may be?
   7. Can a robber who steals in an open sunlight and then accepts it openly be the “head of LEF?”
   8. What is this man teaching LEF youth from his “great exemplary” life and testimony?
   9. If recording the conversation is wrong, then doesn't grabbing away the phone and illegally opening it a bigger offense? Do two wrongs make it right?

   10. Wouldn't it be logically be correct to believe that a man who snatched away another person’s phone and does not feel sorry for his actions was used to snatching away many other things from others?